Skip to content

Gen Z’s struggle against the old order in Nepal

With the fall of the government, Nepal finds itself at an important crossroads, with a young generation hungry for change.

Gen Z’s struggle against the old order in Nepal
Published:

Violent anti-corruption protests forced Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli to resign, the army to patrol Kathmandu, and former Chief Justice Sushila Karki to take office as interim prime minister. The election is scheduled for March 5th, 2026. Expect six months of fragile order marked by curfews, sporadic protests, and activist-led policy volatility. Firms should harden operations against periodic shutdowns, tighten compliance, and plan for a bumpy election cycle in early 2026. 

Current Political Situation

Nepal’s political order has unraveled into its worst crisis since the abolition of the monarchy in 2008. The Gen Z protests, coordinated largely through Discord servers, Instagram, and Facebook, began on September 4, 2025, after the government banned 26 apps—widely seen as an attempt to suppress dissent over “nepo kids” content—posts by politicians' children flaunting lavish lifestyles on social media, which inflamed Gen Z anger given Nepal's widespread poverty (per capita GDP ~$1,300) and high youth unemployment (~20%) . The demonstrations quickly evolved into anti-corruption rallies targeting elites across the Communist Party of Nepal (UML), Nepali Congress, and Maoist Centre. Rather than opposing a single party, the Gen Z movement rejects the entire political order, pressing for a new republic grounded in meritocracy, market-driven growth, digital freedom, and accountability. 

Timeline of Key Events

The interim government already faces legitimacy questions. Gen Z demands leadership based on competence and integrity, while ethnic tensions (e.g., Madhesi vs. hill groups) simmer. Chronic coalition shifts since 2022 have weakened governance, and Nepal remains on the FATF Grey List, complicating aid flows.

Why this matters for business

Nepal is a small, open, remittance-dependent economy whose logistics, tourism, construction, and retail sectors cluster in the Kathmandu Valley. The recent events exposed four vulnerabilities relevant to operators and investors:

Geopolitical Dynamics

Nepal’s status as a Himalayan buffer state makes it a flashpoint in India-China-U.S. rivalry. The current unrest has raised accusations of foreign interference and could reshape alignments.

India-Nepal Relations

India views Nepal through its “Neighbourhood First” policy, rooted in the 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship, which ensures open borders and visa-free movement. India accounts for 64% of Nepal’s trade ($8.85 billion in 2023). Yet Oli’s pivot toward China, capped by BRI agreements, strained ties. Memories of the 2015 blockade to this landlocked country still fuel anti-India sentiment. The current unrest raises immediate risks: India sealed the Uttarakhand border on September 10, stranding migrants and students. Pro-India figures, such as Nepali Congress leader Sher Bahadur Deuba, saw their homes torched, complicating New Delhi’s ability to engage without appearing heavy-handed. Indian pro-BJP government journalists in the streets of Kathmandu are seen being humiliated by the protestors. 

China-Nepal Relations

China has been Nepal’s top source of FDI since 2015, pushing BRI projects in hydropower and infrastructure. Beijing pledged $41 million in aid in 2024 and declared 2025 a “Nepal Visit Year” to boost tourism. Oli’s fall weakens Beijing’s allies, opening space for India. Ongoing trilateral border disputes, including Lipulekh, remain a flashpoint. Beijing’s pragmatism, boosted by the Trump administration’s recent exorbitant tariff on India and in turn a new opening with China, however, suggests it may prioritize stable ties with India over heavy investment in a volatile Kathmandu. Tibetan exile involvement, signaled by the Dalai Lama’s message, adds another sensitive layer for Beijing.

U.S. and Other Influences

The U.S. embassy urged shelter-in-place, while some analysts allege Washington covertly supported protests to counter China, drawing parallels with Sri Lanka’s 2022 unrest. EU leaders welcomed Karki’s appointment as a democratic step. Pakistan’s role is peripheral but not irrelevant: ISI-linked groups such as LeT and JeM could exploit porous borders. 

External Core Interests Risks from Current Crisis
India Security buffer, trade, energy, Gorkha ties Unrest spillover; inflation; stalled cross-border projects.
China BRI access, Tibet security, counter India Loss of pro-Beijing allies; debt risks; border flare-ups
U.S. Democracy promotion, counter-BRI, Indo-Pacific strategy Proxy instability; royalist manipulation; media battles
Pakistan Limited; proxy leverage vs. India Border threats; refugee exploitation

The resignation of Prime Minister Oli roughly a year after Sheikh Hasina's fall from power in Bangladesh, coupled with escalating riots in Indonesia, reflects a deeper regional and generational shift. These events are symptomatic of growing frustrations—particularly among Generation Z—over persistent inequalities, limited economic opportunities, and slow development progress. Across Asia, governments appear increasingly ill-prepared to address the structural challenges posed by youth bulges, social fragmentation, and demands for more inclusive governance. The consequences of neglecting social justice are no longer abstract—they are erupting in the streets.

The political trajectory

Karki’s appointment reflects protesters’ demand for a non-partisan, anti-corruption leader. Her legitimacy depends on forming a capable cabinet, setting a credible election calendar, and ensuring accountability for violence. The army, avoiding overt rule, has become the key referee. Gen Z remains pivotal but divided between moderates and radicals, while royalist and opportunist groups circle. The most likely outcome is a hybrid caretaker phase with the army containing unrest and the interim cabinet advancing anti-graft measures.

Scenarios and corporate exposure (next 6–9 months)

Base case: fragile stabilisation (55%)Nepal is likely to muddle through, echoing its post-2008 transitions: crisis without collapse. Karki’s appointment, shaped by Gen Z consultations on platforms like Discord, signals a compact that could shield the interim cabinet and deliver modest reforms such as customs digitization and police adjustments to placate corruption grievances. Businesses face intermittent border and logistics disruptions along the India–Nepal frontier and slower payments, but viability improves as curfews lift and the army retreats to barracks. International lenders, including the IMF’s $372M facility, may extend conditional support if ethnic tensions remain contained. Upside is capped by coalition infighting and youth demands for accountability, leaving recovery uneven in tourism and remittances (25–33% of GDP). Regionally, India is likely to resume aid to counter Chinese inroads, though risks of spillover from Pakistan-linked militant networks persist.

Downside: relapse into emergency (35%).A relapse is plausible given 72 deaths and 1,300+ injuries, echoing past escalations like the 2015 blockade or 2001 royal massacre. Triggers could be riots over election delays, clashes at disputed sites such as Kalapani, or renewed arson resembling the Sept 9 parliament attack, resulting in extended curfews, blackouts, and army overreach. UML and Nepali Congress contesting Karki’s mandate, plus royalist co-optation of protests, could produce shutdowns, airport closures, and labour flight. Tourism and hospitality—drivers of ~4.5% growth—would be hit hardest. Externally, relapse could stall Chinese BRI projects amid debt concerns, while U.S. “colour revolution” rhetoric risks fueling India-Pakistan proxy tensions along Nepal’s border.

Upside: authoritative caretaker (10%).A compact among the presidency, army, and protest leaders shields the interim cabinet, which moves quickly on customs digitisation, transparent tenders, and police reform. International lenders and donors return with conditional budget support. Operating conditions improve; firms with clean procurement histories gain advantage in new bids.

Operational guidance

What to watch (30–90 days)

Bottom line

Nepal has entered a managed transition in which the army acts as guarantor, a jurist-led interim cabinet seeks legitimacy through anti-corruption moves, and youth leaders hold a veto on the streets and via Discord servers. For companies: lock in supply-chain redundancy, clean up politically exposed counterparties, and plan for periodic slowdowns through the election window. Those who pair operational discipline with impeccable compliance will endure the turbulence and be first in line when procurement normalises.

More in South Asia

See all

More from The Geopolitical Desk

See all
The race for AI leadership in the Gulf
/
Subscribers

The race for AI leadership in the Gulf

/

From our partners